Coverage you can actually read.
This version puts the strongest-supported jurisdictions at the top, makes weaker areas more obvious, and says plainly where coverage is indirect or fallback-only. BriefLink still lets users replace any automatic link with their own URL, including Westlaw and Lexis permalinks.
What the ratings mean
What this table means
Cases are strong almost everywhere because they route through CourtListener. The weaker areas are state statutes, court rules, and regulations, where many states still rely on indirect links or Justia fallback. Westlaw and Lexis are shown separately because BriefLink does not auto-resolve proprietary paywalled sources — but any user-supplied permalink can still be installed.
| Jurisdiction | Cases | Statutes | Constitution | Court rules | Regulations |
|---|
Why sort by coverage strength?
The old alphabetical table made every state look equally readable even when the actual support level varied a lot. This layout pushes the best-covered jurisdictions to the top and makes the weaker ones visibly cluster lower down, which is more honest and easier for a buyer to interpret quickly.
Westlaw and Lexis
BriefLink does not automatically generate paywalled Westlaw or Lexis links. But if a user pastes a valid Westlaw or Lexis permalink into the editor, that URL can still be installed manually on the cite. These columns are therefore shown as Manual URL, not “unsupported.”
What “fallback” really means
Fallback does not mean broken. It means the source is typically Justia or another less-verifiable public host, so the URL works for a human reader in a browser but is not as strong as a direct state-official or deeply structured link.
What users can do when coverage is weak
Even in weaker states, a user can still override the automatic match and paste a better URL for any citation. That keeps the coverage message candid without making the product seem boxed in.